We recovered Car’s original promotion claiming $7,290 from a five-minute Bitcoin bet, and the edited version. Both use the same screenshot. Here are the source records, the corrections, and a searchable archive of every status check.
Exact searches separate an October loss follow-up from a later security post, recover three missing texts and bind an internship post’s edits. The 398-request register below retains its original 02:13–02:21 UTC check. These new checks are recorded separately.
29 OCT · 17:56:18.770 UTC
One newly located incident ID
2115865323979346209 is absent from the earlier register. A publisher embed links the five-word quote “All my positions were sold” to this exact ID. The current X response confirms author deletion and omits the original author and body.
The wording and Car attribution remain publisher-preserved; the original platform text has not been recovered. The time above comes from the status ID, not a deletion timestamp. Publisher record ↗ · X deletion check ↗ · Exact ID and provenance ↗
The embed includes t.co/TSGAY2yEw0, currently resolving to poly.market/user/Car. Historical destinations, clicks and commissions remain unverified.
29 OCT · 19:37:43 UTC
A dated copy of the separate 18:12 post
A successful Base transaction preserves the same truncated 18:12:34 post used in Ethos review 721332. Two RPC providers and the transaction’s actual signature support the record’s date and contents.
Earlier independent chain checks confirm rapid liquidation: 60 sell fills across 59 outcome token IDs from 17:16:10 to 17:17:16 UTC, yielding 656,217.051510 pUSD gross. Gross proceeds do not measure loss, and valid Car-key authorization does not establish consent. Verified liquidation and scope ↗
Three missing texts recovered; two originals remain live.
2064932991680340142 is a deleted self-retweet of a Knicks-win promotion. Its original is also live. A referral parameter and linked trader profile do not establish profile ownership or commission payments.
2083529575116530081 is a self-reply about a Biden-term market. It contains no hack or rescue admission.
These are three recovered status bodies, including two retweets, rather than three newly discovered original posts. Recovery records and source hashes ↗
One internship post, three formal versions.
Archived X metadata binds all three versions to Car’s account and one edit family:
2087705741771538903 · 01:00:11 UTC — internship claim and temporary stop-trading pledge.
The edits span 143 seconds on 13 August. The records establish his wording; the seriousness of the claim, employment and internal access remain unverified. Formal edit history and boundaries ↗
Replies add context without restoring deleted words.
Three live reply objects bind an October reaction chain to the initial loss claim. Their parent links do not authenticate other users’ accusations or recover Car’s deleted body. Exact reply chain ↗
Two additional live parent IDs place Car’s August badge-removal remark inside a prospective airdrop discussion. They supply no evidence of salary or key custody. The later rescue post’s original body and formal edit history remain unrecovered.
On 7 August 2026, Car posted a promotion showing a claimed $7,290 return on a five-minute Bitcoin market. Two archived first-party records identify his account and attachment, then bind the versions through X’s formal edit history:
ORIGINAL · 00:35:35 UTC
2085525224460595550
Deleted by the author. Archived body and media reference recovered.
The critic’s chosen 00:10–00:15 UTC market settled Down. But the image contains no date or market identifier, and its final number also matches the preceding 00:05–00:10 Up market. The exact market has not been bound to the image.
A falling section of the chart also cannot establish a fake Up result: the displayed final price is above its displayed opening price. The recovered evidence establishes Car’s promotion, image and edit; it does not establish image forgery.
02
Two source-discussion replies are deleted. The main thread is live.
In the 23 April 2026 ceasefire thread, two archived replies argue for a bullish interpretation of Iranian statements. Both now return explicit author-deleted notices. The main thread, preceding reply and Car’s approximately 40,000 YES-share disclosure remain live.
DELETED · 01:56:25 UTC
Two linked child posts
One reads a general welcome of dialogue as support for a ceasefire; the other points to reported ceasefire violations. The first expressly acknowledges an inference rather than a literal acceptance announcement.
The eight publicly associated accounts hold more YES than NO shares at all 11 checked times. The flying-wheel account does hold a NO hedge, while the group still holds more YES. An actual 10,000 YES purchase at 16:36:24 supports Car’s later additional-buy statement.
A separate deleted 19 February 2026 UMA.rocks promotion explicitly disclosed sponsorship and marked its oracle-takeover opening as a joke before discussing safeguards. The full text does not support an undisclosed-ad or oracle-attack admission claim.
The $5,000 payment came before the donation statement.
Car’s two 24 June 2026 responses to ChoiceMarkets are now recovered from primary archives, including their formal edit history. He accused the project of running a drainer scheme, refused to promote it and said he had decided to donate $5,000 to the Red Cross. Those are his claims; both versions are now author-deleted.
A client-published screenshot shows a displayed Car account agreeing to two posts for $5,000 and supplying his known Base deposit address. The chain independently confirms that deposit received 5,000 USDC on 8 June. The screenshot is not an authenticated chat record; whether the posts were delivered or a refund followed remains unresolved.
Car’s archived responses dispute the arrangement. Both versions attach the same receipt-style image displaying €4,401.78; charity settlement and the image’s authenticity remain unverified.
The Polygon transaction circulated as proof against the donation occurred on 8 June, sixteen days before the statement. Three successful receipts show a 5,000 USDC credit to Car’s known Base deposit, a forwarding transfer 14 seconds later, and a 5,000 pUSD mint to his main Polymarket wallet 31 seconds after the initial credit. The amount, address and timing match; a service-specific cross-chain request has not been independently bound. These records do not determine whether a later charity donation happened.
Base · 5,000 USDC credited To Car’s known deposit address.
Car’s surviving 18:35:47 UTC reply also sits directly under his deleted initial loss claim and shares Polymarket’s earlier vendor-fixed / make-whole update. It supplies timeline context; it does not identify the drainer or verify a loss amount. Surviving reply ↗
05
Search every checked status ID.
Each row preserves the requested ID, any returned original ID, exact first-party check URL, source provenance and verification hash. 314 author-deleted status IDs comprise the retained 311-ID archive plus three known incident IDs. X returns a different original ID for four live requests, so 84 live responses represent 80 unique returned IDs.
An ID-derived timestamp is a creation-time clue from X’s identifier format. It is not the time a post was deleted. Current deleted responses omit original author and edit-family metadata; those bindings rely on retained source context.
Archived first-party bodies establish the recovered wording and edit relationships. Current first-party responses establish author deletion or a live return. The image and transaction checks establish their own narrower facts. This pass establishes neither a deletion motive nor a connection between Car and the DebugBear drainer.
Checks cover the discovered identifiers, not the account’s complete history. Provider failures and earlier archive gaps remain recorded in the evidence.