Deleted posts.
Checked again.

On 7 August 2026, Car posted a promotion showing a claimed $7,290 return on a five-minute Bitcoin market. Two archived first-party records identify his account and attachment, then bind the versions through X’s formal edit history:

The critic’s chosen 00:10–00:15 UTC market settled Down. But the image contains no date or market identifier, and its final number also matches the preceding 00:05–00:10 Up market. The exact market has not been bound to the image.

A falling section of the chart also cannot establish a fake Up result: the displayed final price is above its displayed opening price. The recovered evidence establishes Car’s promotion, image and edit; it does not establish image forgery.

In the 23 April 2026 ceasefire thread, two archived replies argue for a bullish interpretation of Iranian statements. Both now return explicit author-deleted notices. The main thread, preceding reply and Car’s approximately 40,000 YES-share disclosure remain live.

A separate deleted 19 February 2026 UMA.rocks promotion explicitly disclosed sponsorship and marked its oracle-takeover opening as a joke before discussing safeguards. The full text does not support an undisclosed-ad or oracle-attack admission claim.

Archived replies, live context and sponsored-ad check ↗ · Eight-account balances and recovered signatures ↗

Car’s two 24 June 2026 responses to ChoiceMarkets are now recovered from primary archives, including their formal edit history. He accused the project of running a drainer scheme, refused to promote it and said he had decided to donate $5,000 to the Red Cross. Those are his claims; both versions are now author-deleted.

A client-published screenshot shows a displayed Car account agreeing to two posts for $5,000 and supplying his known Base deposit address. The chain independently confirms that deposit received 5,000 USDC on 8 June. The screenshot is not an authenticated chat record; whether the posts were delivered or a refund followed remains unresolved.

Car’s archived responses dispute the arrangement. Both versions attach the same receipt-style image displaying €4,401.78; charity settlement and the image’s authenticity remain unverified.

The Polygon transaction circulated as proof against the donation occurred on 8 June, sixteen days before the statement. Three successful receipts show a 5,000 USDC credit to Car’s known Base deposit, a forwarding transfer 14 seconds later, and a 5,000 pUSD mint to his main Polymarket wallet 31 seconds after the initial credit. The amount, address and timing match; a service-specific cross-chain request has not been independently bound. These records do not determine whether a later charity donation happened.

Original response · 22:22:36 UTC ↗ · Formal edit · 22:25:51 UTC ↗ · Verified payment records and claim boundaries ↗

The recovered responses establish what Car said. Charity fulfilment and the truth of his accusation against ChoiceMarkets remain unresolved here.

Car’s surviving 18:35:47 UTC reply also sits directly under his deleted initial loss claim and shares Polymarket’s earlier vendor-fixed / make-whole update. It supplies timeline context; it does not identify the drainer or verify a loss amount. Surviving reply ↗

Each row preserves the requested ID, any returned original ID, exact first-party check URL, source provenance and verification hash. 314 author-deleted status IDs comprise the retained 311-ID archive plus three known incident IDs. X returns a different original ID for four live requests, so 84 live responses represent 80 unique returned IDs.

An ID-derived timestamp is a creation-time clue from X’s identifier format. It is not the time a post was deleted. Current deleted responses omit original author and edit-family metadata; those bindings rely on retained source context.

Archived first-party bodies establish the recovered wording and edit relationships. Current first-party responses establish author deletion or a live return. The image and transaction checks establish their own narrower facts. This pass establishes neither a deletion motive nor a connection between Car and the DebugBear drainer.

Download the new metadata evidence pack ↗ · Original status register and hashes ↗

Checks cover the discovered identifiers, not the account’s complete history. Provider failures and earlier archive gaps remain recorded in the evidence.