PUBLIC LEADS PASS — 2026-10-30
New evidence directory only. Earlier frozen reports and source captures untouched.

1. NEW PRIMARY COLLECTOR LABEL: retr544
https://data-api.polymarket.com/v1/leaderboard?user=0x3f99139f1c5854bb628c2e576aaf638e99dffc18&category=OVERALL&timePeriod=ALL&orderBy=PNL&limit=50
Official Data API returned the exact collector address, userName retr544, empty
xUsername, unverified badge, zero volume and PnL -217.096118. This is a current
public leaderboard label; it does not identify the signing-key holder or a human.

The old primary Gamma response captured October 29 at 18:57:37 UTC resolved an
address lookup for collector3f991 to tre54355, user10078779, created17:33:43.260245,
proxy0xd5266a5864aff358456d62aa0e91a84171f34968. Current Gamma lookups for both
addresses return404; both direct official alias pages return404. Current public
comments and activity queries returned empty lists. Public search found no exact
retr544 profile and no tre54355 profile (the retr544 search returned unrelated
fuzzy matches, which are not ownership leads). The leaderboard has no userID, so
these different metadata surfaces do not prove a same-user rename or edit.
Account creation in the old response was during the attack, not preincident.
Comparison and original-capture hash: collector-label-comparison.json.

2. NEW AFFIRMATIVE DELETION RESPONSES FOR BOTH EARLIER CAR POSTS
https://cdn.syndication.twimg.com/tweet-result?id=2115862718452298234&lang=en&token=1
https://cdn.syndication.twimg.com/tweet-result?id=2115869417775255804&lang=en&token=1
Both official X syndication responses now return TweetTombstone with this text:
"This Post was deleted by the Post author."
This upgrades the earlier 404/empty-response ambiguity for the exact initial
$800k claim and the separate frontend/security follow-up. It supplies no deletion
time, motive, editing chronology or proof about the truth of their claims.
The separate rescue-explanation post2115881859704078520 already has the same
affirmative platform response in the preceding pass; its publisher screenshot
remains edited and lacks a recovered platform edit history.

3. SECONDARY ACCOUNT AND FINANCIAL RECIPIENT PUBLIC METADATA
https://gamma-api.polymarket.com/public-profile?address=0x0543635ef8e7981c4885fcfc187bc8564481ef74
Owner054 still resolves to accountgfg44433, proxy5a2764…, user10078835, created
2026-10-29T17:44:15.575915Z, pseudonymGentle-Misplacement-Bonsai. Official public
search and its leaderboard agree; no X identity is supplied. Both owner and
wallet comment queries were empty. No human identity or new control link emerged.

The current 5mTraderYes owner7df8 profile still resolves to proxycfc546…,
user9460489, createdAugust6; owner comments were empty. The current6d132 wallet
and its independently checked ownera5185d6fe3863c1de560f9c1d73be798f76a7662 resolve
to user8145194/Forsaken-Devil, createdMay16. The displayed name is an address-style
default; no social or self-description was recovered and comments were empty.
These profiles support account/key bindings only, not common human ownership.
Current Gamma lookups for3f701 and1332 returned404. Existing proof of1332's
ERC3009 signature remains a different key from3f701, not proof of its owner.

4. NO VERIFIED PREINCIDENT KIT MATCH IN THE BOUNDED SEARCH
Searched exact noncredential TRACK_ID4c6b64a0-a7ef-4c0f-9c70-3a4e6f89065c,
foundClobClient, Requested swap route now unavailable, and
ClobClient has no usable create*Order in public code and web indexes.
Exact GitHub queries returned no matches. An initial unquoted multiword query
returned unrelated word-list/game translations; rerunning it as an exact phrase
returned none. Web UUID matches were October29–30 incident analyses citing the
same payload; no independently dated preincident reuse was established.
This is a bounded negative result, not proof the kit is original or unpublished.
No embedded RPC/API credentials were used, tested or disclosed.

5. OFFICIAL/PRIMARY INCIDENT CONTEXT STILL DOES NOT NAME AN ACTOR
https://x.com/DebugBear
Fresh direct profile HTML exposed the already retained October29 warning and
specialist-response follow-up, but no newer visible root-cause or attribution
statement. Public profile visibility is limited and does not prove no update
exists. Official blog/sitemap fetches returned530 and cannot establish an RCA.

https://www.infostealers.com/article/polymarket-breach-alert-wallet-draining-code-found-in-a-third-party-script/
Fresh researcher source still states its evidence does not identify an attacker
or establish the initial compromise mechanism. Newly indexed copied IOC feeds
and reporting repeat the collector but add no verified person/control link.

https://www.bitquery.io/investigations/polymarket-hack
This first-party research publication uses a different recipient-based scope
(737wallets, $2.73m, cutoffOctober29 19:49). It supplies no human attribution.
Its totals and interpretations were not substituted for the existing reconciled
scope. A claim that every valid approval establishes who approved it is not
supported by public-chain validation alone.

BOUNDARIES
No verified ownership or financial edge joining Car/E044/5mTraderYes/6d132 to the
known drainer group was found in this public-source pass. No private personal
information was sought, no contact was made, no deployment or external
publication occurred, and no old frozen report was edited.
